top of page

Home

Blue Water

Montana Clean Water

"Water is Life."

We want to keep ours.

June Mailer cropped front.PNG

Montana Clean Water Stands Our Ground

- Roundup Article

The recent press statements of Dry-Redwater Authority do not address the concerns of the Highway 200 community. In response to the May 7 article, “DRWA Addresses Allegations Made by Montana Clean Water,” we stand by our statements and invite the community to consider the evidence. How can Dry-Redwater Authority (DRWA) claim there is a pressing need for clean drinking water in the same area that their partner, the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC), is pushing to permit 75 million gallons of high-quality groundwater for fracking per year? The DRWA describes the SchMart Estates on Highway 200 as “having languished without a water source.” The SchMart Estates are 0.5 miles from the wells that DNRC claims will extract 75 million gallons of groundwater, year-round, in 100% consumptive use, without adverse effect to neighboring wells (DNRC Preliminary Determination to Grant, Permit No. 42M 30163320). A sufficient explanation for this contradiction, although known to both government entities, has gone unanswered. DRWA’s website states, “DNRC has worked with DRWA to secure administrative, planning, and construction funding.” According to the 2025 Legislative Financial Division Budget Analysis, DRWA must show a clear need for government water utilities to justify use of taxpayer funding for their projects. Montana Clean Water questions why, if Highway 200 residents have a dire need to purchase government water, would the government approve a 75 million gallon yearly extraction from same area? DRWA’s issuing of a defamatory article and legal threats against Montana Clean Water does not alleviate our concern that adverse impacts to Highway 200 resident’s wells - caused by commercial pumping - would conveniently incentivize residents to purchase DRWA water. Montana Clean Water asks: why is permitting 75 million gallons of Highway 200 groundwater for fracking so important? To answer this question, Montana Clean Water has met with DNRC Director Kaster, Administrator Pakenham-Stevenson and Bureau Chief Wood; the DEQ Director Nowakowski; the Richland County Commissioners Mitchell, Young, and Gorder; Governor Gianforte’s Director of Economic Development, Mark Blasdel; and called DRWA Administrator Mandi Nay to express our concerns about the DNRC’s modeling of the Highway 200 aquifer and the apparent conflict of interest between government partners. Government representatives uniformly denied or deflected responsibility. Blasdel did not comment. DNRC Administrator Pakenham-Stevenson told us that "our hands are tied." (Helena, March 21, 2025) We have also met with Glasgow Regional Director Yang, who stated that the DNRC will continue to permit groundwater for fracking “until there isn’t one drop left.” It is up to Montana’s farmers and ranchers to decide whether permitting groundwater “until there isn’t one drop left” would “harm, threaten or diminish” their rights. The DNRC application modeled that the applicant’s wells “would experience a predicted total drawdown of 30.7, 54.3, and 40.5 ft. respectively” at the end of the first year. “The remaining available water column for Well #1, Well #2, and Well #3 is 17.8, 0.3, and 18.1 ft…”(DNRC Draft Preliminary Determination to Grant, Permit No 42M 30163320, Pg. 19). How much further will these wells draw down in the second year of pumping? Elected officials and government bureaucrats will permit an aquifer away until there isn’t one drop left. Why? Since its creation in 2005, DRWA has not qualified for federal funding because the cost outweighs the benefits. The DNRC prioritizes project funding based on several criteria, with the “top three” being: 1. Need - Is there an “urgent need for the construction?” 2. Feasibility – “Can the project move forward this biennium?” (over the next two years) 3. Cost & Funding – “Is the project affordable, dependent on federal and state funds, and is the community prepared to pay their share?” (MCEP, Montana Legislative Financial Division Budget Analysis, 2025 Biennium, pg. F-23.) According to their February 2025 meeting minutes, DRWA’s Highway 200 project includes a total of 64 connections. 29 belong to the Schmart Estates subdivision, with two unoccupied homes and 27 vacant lots. DRWA is requesting $8,200,000 of “DNRC and Richland County ARPA funding” for its 2025 Highway 200 West project. The timeline is urgent: ARPA funds must be granted and spent by December 31, 2025, as tracked by a countdown clock on the DNRC Website. arpa-mtdnrc.hub.arcgis.com. DRWA’s four-county project will ultimately cost taxpayers $891,957,210.33 (2026 dollars) for a speculative 4,403 connections. Approximately 440 of those connections would be pasture taps. Further, this total number includes towns, such as Richey, which will not receive updated infrastructure from the DRWA –instead, DRWA will build holding tanks to replace the town’s well and reverse osmosis systems. (DRWA 2023 Predesign Report, pgs. 3, 19, 153.) DRWA Administrator Mandi Nay has called for facts, truth, and transparency. Montana Clean Water agrees that transparency is vital to establishing community trust; therefore, with the help of legal counsel, we have made the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for government documentation and communications - including grant or loan funding from the Richland County Commissioners, the Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (DNRC), and the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), as well as involvement with the DRWA from 2020-present. The DNRC alone has 2,380 items for this period. While DRWA claims there are “no backroom deals, no special treatment, no collusion” between the DNRC and Richland County, both have supported DRWA with millions of taxpayer funds. Currently, DNRC funds DRWA’s administrative costs, building costs, and reports. DNRC Grant Administrator Rick Duncan stated that the State of Montana would likely get credit from the Bureau of Reclamation for project segment expenditures. Richland County has funded and gifted DRWA’s projects: “ The Sidney South Extension was Dry-Redwater’s first extension, and was designed and constructed by Richland County and gifted to DRWA. “ (DRWA Meeting Minutes, July 2024) Furthermore, as an advantageous coincidence, “The Richland County Commissioners have agreed to allow users to apply DRWA connection fees to property taxes, paying it off over a period of twenty years at 3.5%.”(DRWA User Agreement, February 2025) DRWA’s website states: “DRWA is working hard to make its Highway 200 West extension a reality” and “DRWA is planning its Culbertson Lambert Fairview line, which will provide water to the communities of Lambert and Fairview, as well as nearly 800 rural users in between.” To Montana Clean Water, it appears that the DNRC and Richland County are also working to make the Highway 200 West extension a reality. DRWA’s 2023 Predesign Report, funded by the DNRC, claims that “8 out of 10 homes will connect (pg. 44).” A complete and detailed financial audit is due, and is the only means to assuage what the DRWA calls “public distrust and fear about water access and change.” (Cease and Desist Letter, from DRWA to MCW, April 30, 2025) Many Highway 200 residents do not need or want to be forced into paying for expensive, chlorinated water monitored by Smart Meters – which upload resident’s water usage information “96 times every day” and “automatically link with DRWA’s billing software. (PDR 2023, pgs. 115-119)” We want our wells, water rights, property values, and environment thoughtfully respected and maintained by our government, as elected officials and appointed bureaucrats are invested by the power of the people to do so. DRWA administrator claims that Montana Clean Water is "dangerously misleading." We ask DRWA: Dangerous to what? Misleading to whom?" Montana Clean Water is a community organization that works to protect clean water for agricultural and residential needs, and seeks to bring awareness about industries and practices which may affect water quality and availability. - Montana Clean Water Team

The Objection Deficiency Notice

Many Richland County residents filed an official objection to Big Horn Leasing’s Water Permit 42M 30163320 with the Montana DNRC.

The DNRC’s response? A letter declaring the objection “deficient.”

In that letter, they ask objectors 25 times to provide “facts” to support their concerns — while the DNRC itself relies on vague terms like “model assumptions,” “the best visual and statistical match,” and “generally” to justify their own data.

Why the double standard?
Why are permit applicants given help and guidance, while local residents are asked to do the impossible?

One line in the deficiency notice demands:

 

“The Objection must provide forward-looking, quantitative groundwater modeling demonstrating that further depletion of said aquifer would increase levels of contamination.”

How can ordinary residents be expected to provide the kind of scientific modeling that entire agencies struggle to get right?

They are helping permittees fill out paperwork while placing impossible burdens on the people trying to protect their water.

 

To read the full deficiency notice, click the link below.

Highlights From Dry-Redwater Authority's

Predesign Report (2023)

“A Good Intention Fee of $100 was paid by interested landowners and public water suppliers to show their commitment to a rural water system. DRWA collected $73,525 to-date.” Pg.  17,18

“Phases were established using a combination of cost estimates for each line number, pipeline lengths and quantity of residential users. Phases were organized to capture the bulk of revenue from the project’s bulk users in the first years of the project to cover OM&R costs and provide coverage for construction loans.” Pg.9

“DRWA was encouraged by DNRC to continue progress on this project knowing that federal authorization would be likely. DNRC recommended to DRWA they use DNRC funding for this Predesign Report. This PDR answers most of the DEC report’s Findings and Recommendations.” Pg. 18

“There are approximately 1,564 (in 2020) rural homes that will be served by DRWA. The towns of Circle (2020 population 511), Fairview (2020 population 898), Richey (2020 population 167), Lambert (2020 population 84) and Jordan (2020 population 412) will receive water from DRWA. These towns will be responsible for continuing to maintain their municipal water systems and delivering water to their users. DRWA will deliver water to each town’s tank.” Pg. 19

“The number of pasture taps were determined by multiplying the residential meters by 30%.” Pg.44

“The 2022 water model is 100% saturated, meaning every existing house that met the 1 ½ miles criteria are added to the water model. The general rule for a rural water model is 80% saturation, i.e., 8 out of 10 homes will connect.” Pg. 44

“…none of DRWA’s tanks will include additional storage for municipal fire flow requirements.” Pg. 44

“….aerial photography were used to locate every existing home in DRWA’s service area.” Pg.43

“The 2022 water model is 100% saturated, meaning every existing house that met the 1 ½ miles criteria are added to the water model. The general rule for a rural water model is 80% saturation, i.e., 8 out of 10 homes will connect. Therefore, the 2022 water model which is 100% saturated is equal to 80% saturation in year 2040 with population increases and new home construction.” Pg. 44

“The Fort Peck Water Treatment Plant will use chloramines for disinfection since they tend to remain active for longer periods and at greater distances from the plant than free chlorine. Chloramines are disinfectants used to treat drinking water. Chloramines are most commonly formed when ammonia is added to chlorine to treat drinking water and they provide longer-lasting disinfection as the water moves through pipes to consumers. This type of disinfection is known as secondary disinfection. EPA requires water utilities to meet strict health standards when using chloramines to treat water. The regulations are based on the average concentration of chloramines found in a water system over time.” Pg. 115

“Per Circular DEQ 1, chloramine concentrations should be maintained higher than chlorine to avoid nitrifying bacterial activity.” Pg.115

“A note of caution regarding chloramines is kidney dialysis treatment which can be upset by the use of chloraminated water. Medical authorities, hospitals, and aquarium keepers should be notified of chloramine disinfection if these businesses connect to DRWA so they can take precautions.” Pg. 117

“DRWA will be requesting a deviation from DEQ-1, Section 8.5.1 for valves to change requirements from ALL high points to needed high points. For this PDR, air/vac valve spacing is every 4 miles.” Pg. 118

 “A note of caution regarding chloramines is kidney dialysis treatment which can be upset by the use of chloraminated water. Medical authorities, hospitals, and aquarium keepers should be notified of chloramine disinfection if these businesses connect to DRWA so they can take precautions.” Pg. 117

“DRWA will be requesting a deviation from DEQ-1, Section 8.5.1 for valves to change requirements from ALL high points to needed high points. For this PDR, air/vac valve spacing is every 4 miles.” Pg. 118

“Advanced Metering Infrastructure Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) provides consistent two-way communication between customers and the utility that gives both parties real-time data. AMI water meters have the capability to send water use data over a communications network.” Pg.118

“…the meters are read once every 15 minutes for a total of 96 readings every day.” Pg.118

“Smart meters allow the customer to make resourceful decisions to save money such as managing decisions about service and usage, examples being cost and consumption.” Pg. 118

“Using AMI smart meters, the utility or customer can go to a network and observe in real time how the water is being used and where, without having to go anywhere.”  Pg. 118

“The Project will supply safe and reliable drinking water to 4,403 rural and municipal connections within DRWA’s service area.” Pg. 149

“The cost per rural and municipal connection is $171,165.12/connection. The worth of this Project is increased dramatically when factoring in pasture taps and the increase in livestock production which benefits the nation as a whole. Reclamation is performing the economic analysis of the Project during the feasibility study.” Pg. 149

“The Phasing Plan is not only used to plan construction of the Project but also used to lobby the federal, state, and local funding needed ahead of design and construction activities.” Pg.149

 

“Phases were organized to capture the bulk of revenue from the Project’s bulk users in the first years of the Project to cover OM&R costs and provide coverage for construction loans. After all bulk users are connected, prioritization of the Phases shifted to those rural reaches with the greatest quantity of residential meters through Project completion.” Pg. 150

“Construction of the Project will take more than 10 years should federal funding not be made available in accordance with the Phase Plan and in a timely matter.” Pg. 152

“A Notice to Proceed is planned to be issued for the Project in 2026.” Pg. 152

Blue Water
Sidney Montana Billboard

Preserving Clean Water For Future Generations

We strongly oppose the use of clean, potable water for hydraulic fracturing (fracking). While petroleum products have undoubtedly contributed to the advancement of modern society, we firmly believe that clean water resources should not be sacrificed in the process. We urge industry stakeholders to source water from alternative locations and transport it as needed, rather than relying on our valuable water supply. Our wells are vital to the health and well-being of our communities, and we must ensure their protection for future generations.

How We Got Here

In the summer of 2024, our community experienced a severe water crisis as many local wells went dry. This situation coincided with a time when a significant portion of our fresh water resources were being diverted for hydraulic fracturing (fracking) operations. While we recognize the important role the oil and gas industry plays in supporting local jobs and the economy, we also face the pressing challenge of protecting our limited water supply, especially our aquifers. As companies seek permits to continue using these vital resources for fracking, it is essential that we prioritize the sustainability of our freshwater sources. We propose exploring alternative water sources for industrial use. This will help ensure that our community continues to have access to safe, reliable water for drinking, agriculture, and other essential needs, now and in the future.

pexels-tom-fournier-208942721-16852979.jpg

No Drops Left -
A Letter From Our Founder

A letter to the Editor from our founder, Dani-John Bennion, that was published in the Sidney Roundup Newspaper.

Using the community aquifer for fracking will have significant and long-lasting effects on our area of Richland County. Ground water sources are not easily refilled once emptied. This puts the water supply at risk for over 1,400 wells in the area. These wells provide essential water for local households, farms, and businesses. Relying on them for fracking operations threatens to deplete this vital resource. If the aquifer is drained, residents will face steep costs for water from city sources, driving up their bills. In addition, those living on farms or in rural areas may have to spend thousands of dollars just to have a pipeline extended to their properties. The loss of this water source would raise everyday expenses and disrupt agricultural practices, affecting livelihoods and local economies. Our aquifer should not supply water needs for fracking, when it is fundamental to the health of our community and ecosystem.

Why This Is Important To You!

Will Your Water Be Affected?

In the 79 page Document Available on the DNRC website is a list of the wells that are in the area of Proposed water use. 

"Appendix A: Active Groundwater Rights Within the Zone of Influence" (Page 34) 

To see if you are on the list, use the link below to find the original document on the DNRC website.

Man Camp off highway 200 Richland Montana Bighorn drilling frack

Page 4 of DNRC BIG HORN LEASING LLC Draft Preliminary Determination to Grant Permit

Contact Lists

Your Representatives 

We have compiled a comprehensive list of representatives whom you can contact directly to express your concerns, ensuring that your voice is heard and considered. 

Montana DNRC

Montana DNRC Website & Facebook Page

DRWA Dry-Redwater Regional Water Authority

Dry Red Water Website

Forms and Documents

DRWA predesign report photo on phone.jpg

Dry Redwater Authority Predesign Report (2023)

Dry Redwater Authority's Plans PDF.

Montana DNRC
Montana DNRC form

The DNRC'S Environmental Assessment on the potential impact of their plans on our area. 

Montana DNRC form

Form 609

This form is for you if you have a water use complaint or have witnessed a misuse of water.

Montana DNRC application
DNRC well drilling

The DNRC's Water Well Drilling Document for Prospective Well Owners.

Water Rights Permit Application

The Water Rights Permit Application submitted to the DNRC by Big Horn Leasing LLC.

DNRC Preliminary Determination to Grant Permit

DNRC Preliminary Determination To Grant 

- This was attached with the Water Rights Permit Application

Environmental Assessment

Water Well Drilling For Prospective Well Owners

"Groundwater Rights Making Waves"


The Sidney Roundup recently published another story highlighting the ongoing water rights disagreement between the DNRC, Big Horn Leasing, and concerned citizens. Over 1,350 wells have been identified as potentially impacted.

Sidney roundup article 2.png

GOVERNOR GIANFORTE 

Address:

Governor Greg Gianforte 
P.O. Box 200801 
Helena, MT 59620-0801 

 

Phone: (406) 444-3111

  

Online Comment Submission Form:

https://montana.servicenowservices.com/gov?id=sc_cat_item&sys_id=80efbfe91b8a5d100b73a8efe54bcbcd 

ATTORNEY GENERAL KNUDSEN

Address:

Office of the Attorney General
Montana Department of Justice

P.O. Box 201401

Helena, MT 59620-1401

Phone: (406) 444-2026                

Fax: (406) 444-3549       

E-mail: contactdoj@mt.gov

Online Form to Request a Meeting: https://dojmt.gov/attorney-generals-office/request-a-meeting-the-ag/

SENATOR TIM SHEEHY

Address:

Senator Tim Sheehy

Russell Senate Office Building

Suite 124

Washington, DC 20510

 

Phone: (202) 224-2644               

REPRESENTATIVE MORGAN THIEL 

Address:

Rep. Morgan Thiel

120 E Main St
Sidney, MT 59270

 

Phone: (406) 480-6271               

Email: Morgan.Thiel@legmt.gov

SENATOR GREGG HUNTER

Address:

Senator Gregg Hunter 

PO Box 292
Glasgow, MT 59230

 

Phone: (406) 219-7590   

Email: Gregg.Hunter@legmt.gov

REPRESENTATIVE LER

Address:

Rep. Brandon Ler 

11313 County Rd 338

Savage, MT 59262

Telephone: (406) 480-5687

Email address: Brandon.Ler@legmt.gov

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION –

Montana Area Office

Address:

Ryan Newman, Area Manager

Montana Area Office

Bureau of Reclamation

2900 Fourth Avenue N., Ste. 501

Billings MT 59101

 

Phone: (406) 247-7296
Fax: (406) 247-7338

Website: https://www.usbr.gov/gp/mtao/

Online Missouri Basin Region Comment Submission Form:

https://www.usbr.gov/gp/contact.html#comments

DRWA 

Address: 

Dry-Redwater Regional Water Authority

106 10th Street 

PO Box 276

Circle, MT 59215

 

Phone: (406) 485-3792

Email: drwa@midrivers.com  and  drwa2@midrivers.com 

Contact Us

Montana Clean Water

PO Box 1010

Sidney, MT 59270

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
Montana Clean water Logo
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • X

Montana Clean Water

bottom of page